You might think history and old books have no relevance, and can be disregarded according to what you believe? If history occurs because of a well-protected historically-unchanged scholarship and structure of authority from more than 1000 years ago, governing a civilisation you wrongly believe is a religion? Please consider reading the previous Critical Summaries.
If something claims to be a duck but walks like a wolf, eats like a wolf, thinks like a wolf and behaves like a wolf, would you call that something a wolf or a duck?
“The Unchallengeable Miracles of the Qur’an” overseen by Yusuf Al-Hajj Ahmad and published by the Darussalam company is repulsive in so many topics, hence making it very difficult to pick a truly reprehensible winner.
Advocating genocide of all Jews and hence destruction of Israel by a certain date according to the historically-unchanged authoritative scholarship of Sunni Islam binding on all Sunni Muslims from more than 1000 years ago? Proving the invasion of Constantinople was instigated and self-fulfilling merely because of one Muslim telling another Muslim what the prophet Muhammad had ‘prophesised’?
Castigating values and societies of East and West which allow the sexes to mingle instead of a segregated society, because of the best guardians of Sunni Islam enabling the unique civilization of Sunni Islam to masquerade as a religion? Only then could these books promoting subjugation and intolerance of non-Muslims be sold in such countries.
Claiming sex crimes in countries not ruled by Islamic law are due to such values, these dishonest scholars and creators of such books refuse to point out how Islam and the Qur’ān make certain believers view non-Muslim men and women in the worst light, thus leading to murders and sexual assaults of non-Muslims.
If there was a book capable of winning an award for “Complete Bullshit Subterfuge Resulting in War and Chaos and Crime-surges To Destroy The World From More Than 1000 Years Ago” propaganda, this Darussalam book citing vital Islamic history would win that award for the year 2010. Which chapter in this book promotes war based on such history, and promotes the idea of Muslims today emulating the best early Muslim warmongers in conquering non-Muslims?
In the chapter “Victory and Consolidation of Power on Earth”, 24:55 of the Qur’ān opens the chapter and is cited alongside an authentic oral tradition revealing Allah of the Qur’ān told the prophet Muhammad some people from his Ummah will imprison and kill others. 24:55 starts by telling you about how Allah will grant those who believe and do righteous deeds to become rulers. Please remember how and why Al-Islam is a deen and not a religion, as explained and proven in earlier entries. If you see the word “religion” pertaining to Islam in a book, simply replace it as “deen”. The Darussalam book translates the Arabic verse to become:
[Allah has promised among you who believe, and who do righteous good deeds, that He will certainly grant them succession to the (present rulers) on Earth, as He granted it to those before them, and that He will grant them the authority to practise their religion, that which he has chosen for them (ie Islam). And He will surely give them in exchange a safe security after their (fear) provided they (believers) worship Me and do not associate anything (in worship) with me. But those who disbelieved after this, they are the Fasiquoon (rebellious, disobedient to Allah).” (Soorah An-Noor 24:55)]
In this chapter, who are the examples of the best Muslims, regarding those Muslims who first became rulers by attacking and invading non-Muslim lands? The first three Rightful Caliphs of Sunni Islam are praised with details, for their invasion and conquering of non-Islamic territory and non-Muslims to spread the rule of Islam, transforming such righteous good deeds from local to global proportions. There is also an oral tradition cited on the same page as the quoted verse of Soorah An-Noor 24:55. The oral tradition is as follows:
[ Thauban reported that Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) said:
Allah drew the ends of the world near one another for my sake. And I have seen its eastern and western ends. And the dominion of my Ummah would reach those ends which have been drawn near me and I have been granted the red and the white treasure and I begged my Lord for my Ummah that it should not be destroyed because of famine, nor be dominated by an enemy who is not amongst them to take their lives and destroy them root and branch, and my Lord said: Muhammad, whenever I make a decision, there is none to change it. I grant you for your Ummah that it would not be destroyed by famine and it would not be dominated by an enemy who would not be amongst it and would take their lives and destroy them root and branch even if all the people from the different parts of the world join hands together (for this purpose), but it would be from amongst them, viz. your Ummah, that some people would kill the others or imprison the others.]
Remember the Eastern and Western ends literally mentioned in this oral tradition, because it is hilarious when you see Critical Summary 4 detailing and exposing the fundamental failure of the authentic Sunnah in Sunni Islam, the Qur’ān, Allah of the Qur’ān, and the prophet Muhammad alongside all earliest Muslims failing basic science from more than 1000 years ago.
More than 1000 years ago, Imam Muslim (student of Imam Bukhārī) chose this oral tradition to be retained in his Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, in the Book of Portents and Tribulations of the Last Hour (known as Kitāb Al-Fitan wa Ashrat As-Sa’ah). This oral tradition belongs to the authentic Sunnah which is responsible for the historically-unchanged authoritative scholarship of Sunni Islam, speaks of Islam being granted ultimate victory, and some Muslims from within the Ummah will kill and imprison others. Are any other people cited and praised, other than the first three Rightful Caliphs of Sunni Islam? No. Are there any Muslims being used as examples of why killing and imprisoning people is bad? No.
This chapter is clearly and entirely about praising the first three Rightful Caliphs and their warmongering achievements, such as the invasion of Persia whereby Muslims attacked and killed some enemies but without specific bloody numbers.
This chapter indirectly teaches you how the following people are justified in emulating these Caliphs and helping Islam to achieve Victory and Consolidation of power on earth: Al-Qaeda, Taliban, Islamic State, all other Islamic groups and civilians identifying as Muslims insisting on a Caliphate, insisting on implementing Hijrah in a country not ruled by Islam, insisting on instituting Islamic law in a country not ruled by Islam and/or insisting on attacking and conquering non-Muslims by openly sabotaging their ways of life through intimidation and crimes.
Sunnah.com translates this chapter title containing this oral tradition as “(parts of) This Ummah will destroy one another.” Is this truly prophetic, given how deceitful and overly-selective the best guardians of true knowledge within Sunni Islam have been towards the Sunni Muslims they mislead based on intentions (niyyah) for the sake of Allah, which naturally results in Muslims killing each other without truly knowing why?
Depending on your beliefs and your ignorance, you might say an oral tradition belonging in crumbling old books full of flaws can be ignored. But as you read this in 2018 and 2019, in a glossy and modern hardcover Darussalam book published in 2010 being sold in many Islamic bookstores and online booksellers all over the world, in European countries such as France and Germany, non-European countries such as USA and Canada, and countries throughout Asia and Africa? These 3 pages explain what this oral tradition really signifies, while promoting the goal of Islam triumphing as a modern concept to be eventually achieved. See pictorial proof below for yourself.
Do you think you have understood Sunni Islam’s history and scholarship accurately?
Pages 60, 61 and 62 of “The Unchallengeable Miracles of the Qur’an” explicitly encourages Muslims to do their best to triumph over non-Muslims, through advocating vital Islamic history as examples to emulate, states Allah will grant Muslims victory over disbelievers, and goes into detail for justification using what the prophet Muhammad achieved due to the blessings of Allah and also uses the history of the first 3 rightful Sunni Caliphs known as Abū Bakr, `Umar ibn Al-Khattāb and ‘Uthmān ibn ‘Affān respectively about how Muslims triumphed over non-Muslims.
Due to Page 60 citing verse 24:55 of the Qur’ān and then also citing the oral tradition on the same page into page 61, before revealing the horrible history of Islam’s first thee Rightful Caliphs? This entire chapter teaches you how Allah gives full authority to the authentic Sunnah which includes oral traditions in certain books outside the Qur’ān, since there exists such an oral tradition recording his promise.
As the Darussalam book writes on page 61, “This is a promise from Allah, the Exalted, to his Messenger, blessings and peace of Allah be upon him, that he would make the Ummah leaders on the earth and rulers of all the people, and that the affairs of the land shall be put at right through them and that their fellow human beings shall be their subjects.”
If you read from an Islamic POV, as this Darussalam book intends and justifies in these 3 pages: Allah enabled the prophet Muhammad not to die until he had conquered the lands of Khaibar, Makkah (Mecca), Bahrain, the rest of the Arabian Peninsula and all of Yemen, and collected jizyah. On Page 62, second rightful Sunni caliph `Umar ibn Al-Khattāb is described as being second to the prophet Muhammad in terms of excellent qualities and ideal justice. He is described as being responsible for conquering the rest of Syria, the whole of Egypt, and most of the Persian provinces, thus bringing them under the banner of Islam. You should read how Khosrau is described.
He is also described as spending the wealth of two rulers (Khosrau and Caesar) in the way of Allah, as a recognition of Allah’s fulfillment of a promise to the prophet Muhammad. These 3 pages are so wonderfully and horrifically succinct in summary.
If your country is not ruled by Islam and/or you are a non-Muslim, how do you feel about such books being sold in your country in selective bookstores for the sake of the civilisation of Sunni Islam eventually conquering you and destroying what you hold dear?
How do you feel about guardians of Islam ensuring the historically-unchanged authoritative scholarship of Sunni Islam binding on all Sunni Muslims from more than 1000 years ago has not been taught publicly to all Muslims and non-Muslims about how and why Islam is not a religion, but a nation and civilisation for all of humanity to submit to, while such books also advocate the killing and imprisoning and invasion and destruction of whatever Islam does not approve of your country and your country’s history?
Read the 3 pages for yourself. Read what has been screen-capped from Sunnah.com. Grasp the potential impact of what is being taught by the ulema, in speeches of mosques and rooms of madrasahs worldwide for more than 1000 years, which you know nothing about. This oral tradition and other oral traditions of equal authority are also used to teach the details regarding words and actions of prayers, phrases of charity such as “Allāhu ʾAkbar” which efficiently combine jihad and charity, and many other aspects of life in words and actions as a Muslim, according to Sunni Islam.
If you know the details of the Hijrah, you will understand the significance of mosques and madrasahs as vital institutions comprising the foundations of Islam, and infidels will never be allowed to interfere with the foundations of Islam.
Jizyah is the payment made by non-Muslims such as Jews and Christians to sustain the administration governing the Islamic State, and acceptance of living in peace with Muslims while not propagating their evil ways or opposing Muslims and Islam. Zakat is an honourable payment for Allah, while jizyah is a dishonourable yearly price to pay for perpetuating errors which oppose the righteousness of Islam and true Muslims.
Since these 3 pages in the Darussalam Book use authoritative Islamic sources, the prophet Muhammad and the first 3 rightful Sunni caliphs are proven to be the best example of some of the Ummah imprisoning and killing those considered non-Muslims on behalf of all Muslims for the sake of the nation and civilisation of Islam, which the Ottoman caliphs and sultans (known as Osmanlis) emulated and were thus exempted from Hajj, because of Islamic law being interpreted through the relevant scholars of Islamic Jurisprudence.
Nowhere in these 3 pages of details does the Darussalam book speak of Muslims destroying one another. These 3 pages speak of Islam conquering non-Muslims. Because many Muslims and non-Muslims do not believe reality and/or do not know how to study Islam, historical sources must be used alongside modern global publishers who propagate these authoritative sources, to expose the true reality and full impact of Islam. Darussalam is not the only publishing company doing so.
Do you still believe history has no relevance, and you still believe you have a right to believe whatever you want, and your choices or ignorance have no consequences? What will you believe: This Darussalam book sold in many countries all over this world, or that translation based on your opinion of reading it on Sunnah.com?
If a website could teach you how to navigate the scholarship of Sunni Islam without being misled, and help hundreds of millions of people currently suffering in this world and creating permanently beneficial solutions to everybody, while doing justice to the victims of Islam for more than 1000 years… Do you think this knowledge should be globally reported and disseminated?
The concept of the Last Hour and Day of Judgment + belief in the divine book of the Qur’an + belief in the prophet Muhammad + belief in Allah of the Qur’ān is obligatory for all Sunni Muslims to believe, or you are not a true believer ie not a true Muslim, since these concepts constitute 4 of the 6 articles of faith (iman) in Sunni Islam. Do you know about the ten nullifiers of iman?
This hugely laughable error about the sun rising from the West in the Last Hour, found in the most authoritative oral traditions of certain books and detailing the revelation of certain verses of the Qur’ān? Allah of the Qur’ān allowed the prophet Muhammad to believe all that. In turn, said prophet taught at least 3 of his Companions to believe in the most obvious failure of Sunni Islam, from Allah of the Qur’ān and his messenger.
Before you say this only disproves Sunni Islam and not the Qur’ān, do you Sunni Muslims constitute more than 80% of the current global Muslim population? Why did Allah allow an overwhelming majority of Muslims to believe wrongly in a scholarship binding on all Sunni Muslims, from more than 1000 years ago?
If you claim to endorse the Qur’ān, can you explain why Allah of the Qur’ān allowed his best guardians of Islam to deceive at least 80% of Muslims globally for more than 1000 years, about this hideously glaring fundamental error being a foundation for the Qur’ān and Sunnah?
For more than 1000 years, Sunni Islam never lost its historically reliable scholarship and the clear path of adherence. It is merely a matter of whether you can grasp and see for yourself and realise how it is taught. The best guardians of Islam are defined as such because of how they teach according to intentions and Islamic law as defined in the most authoritative doctrines, and not according to what you may assume or believe.
Can you explain how Muslims from all over the world go to Syria and Iraq to fight for Islamic State or want to go there, and why Muslims who wish to fight for Islamic State are born in countries such as Belgium, Russia, England, Indonesia, Malaysia, France and Singapore?
This write-up alone is urgent relevant news which should be reported. Sadly, nobody has done so yet. Would it be interesting to see what types of journalism and values truly exist in this world, when it comes to global crises and solutions? Given the state of mainstream media and alternative media in this day and age, we need to find out.